Aetna’s ambiguous definition of “medically necessary” failed to justify its exclusion of proton therapy for treating adult non-metastatic breast or prostate cancer, a judge decided.
Join The Ecosystem
Aetna’s ambiguous definition of “medically necessary” failed to justify its exclusion of proton therapy for treating adult non-metastatic breast or prostate cancer, a judge decided.
Please confirm you want to block this member.
You will no longer be able to:
Please note: This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin. Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.